Join MultiplyOpen a Free ShopSign InHelp
MultiplyLogo
SEARCH
ReviewReviewJun 21, '08 11:23 AM
for everyone
Category:Movies
Genre: Animation
I am not a cartoonist, nor an animator, nor a general 2D person. Professionally speaking, I avoid projects that require animation and movement. I hate it and I hate the technicalities involved with it.

Now Urduja is a good try, considering the various factors that dictate that everything else that could make it so much MUCH worse.

I would want to tell you the plot of the movie (probably spoil it too because I'd want to save you from ever watching it... too mean. Forget what I said), but there were too many subplots that within half of the movie you ask, "What's the story about again?"

True story.

The plot in itself is simple, but layers upon unnecessary layers of plot-fat, the premise (and the focus) of the movie invariably gets lost in translation. With the plot-fat comes, as a lack of a better word, plot holes that render succeeding scenes WTF-able, watch it and you will see, don't watch it and save yourself some time.

The animation is good. In the beginning. You see a highly photographic-like atmosphere in the introduction of the movie, but as you continue on (more like struggle to) the middle, 3D becomes more apparent, textures become less obvious until ultimately, it's just flat cartoon, with no hint of the previous standard set earlier in the same movie.

The one thing I noticed just watching the trailer was the fact that there are no ambient light to reflect on the characters. There were no changes in the colors when they move environments, night scenes, day scenes, flying through the air scenes were all of the same lighting, even in the underwater scene.

There were no varying shadows and highlights whenever the characters move. As a matter of fact the shadow Urduja has was the one below her chin to show a bit of dimension. The most detailed shadows of any of the characters were the badjaos. Racism is also hinted within the dialogue.

Glitches are apparent, for example, having two right hands of the same character appearing on the same frame, I think they forgot to tween it or something.

The camera panning was exhausting. It pans too fast too soon even when the dialogue dictates that "ang ganda ng tanawin!"

WHAT SCENERY?! it was too fast to appreciate!

There were also inconsistencies with the actual character animation. Some scenes lacked frames, making the animation choppy, even rushed. Some scenes were extremely detailed, especially the close up talking scenes. The attempted slow motion scenes were a failure, instead of it being slow motion, it just feels choppy and incomplete.

Plus points for the extremely detailed monologue scenes though.

I'm not even going into the animation of the song and dance numbers.

Audio is relatively okay. It gives of the telanovela audio feel. The dialogue was "in-your-face" direct but still inconsistent. At least it was clean.

There were not much ambient sounds to realize the scenes comprehensively. You hear nuances, but rarely. Ocean breeze, or waves crashing? barely. Birds chirping? When there were birds around. Even the rustling of the trees when they were fighting in the jungle was missing.

The script? O no. The story is initially focused on the main character Urduja (Regine Velasquez), but as the non-story progresses, Lim Hang (Cesar Montano) becomes the de facto lead. Even then, both characters fail to spark an interest. Comedy relief characters such as Mayumi (Ruby Rodriguez), Daisuke (Epi Quizon), and the Disney-archetype talking animals (Allan K. and Michael V.) were far more interesting.

Historically, The story was painful and lacked research. It lacks the depth of primitive Philippine culture. Textiles within the Philippines, if not imported from China, was mostly dark reds and browns (as far as i remember from Philippine Art History) Not blue or green.

I do understand the need of plain clothes as the animation process is extremely hard. Textiles in the Philippines tell a story. It's like the Grecian vases but with cloth. This makes Urduja a failure as a culturally relevant movie.

Without the Filipino voices, there would barely enough visual evidence to suggest that the movie was pre-hispanic Filipino era. It could have been easily some other indigenous tribe anywhere in the world.

What irkes me is the semi-frequent use of the english language in a pre-colonial Filipino culture. Considering that only the comedic relief characters were the only ones talking the wrong language, but the already lost Filipino hint fades completely even for a second.

So what's left as purely good with the movie? Well... They give the succeeding Filipino films an extremely big room for improvement.

Ms Bea has some thoughts about it, click here!


22 CommentsChronological   Reverse   Threaded
kurayami wrote on Jun 21, '08
Ohhhh so that's the title :D
skysenshi wrote on Jun 21, '08
Ang haba ng review ah. Hehehe. Naging poetic ka pa sa sobrang inis. I'm going to write a shorter one, probably, because my students are curious about what I thought of the movie.
shizofree wrote on Jun 21, '08
Ang haba ng review ah. Hehehe. Naging poetic ka pa sa sobrang inis. I'm going to write a shorter one, probably, because my students are curious about what I thought of the movie.
the movie was insane enough that it pushed me to rant about it.
skysenshi wrote on Jun 21, '08
katatapos ko lang isulat yung akin. post ko in a bit.
rockstar09 wrote on Jun 21, '08
=) im speechless
skysenshi wrote on Jun 21, '08
ey. i added a little trivia to my review. it's an article about the old urduja movie, starring amalia fuentes: http://www.coolay.com/2008/06/22/urduja
shizofree wrote on Jun 22, '08
ey. i added a little trivia to my review. it's an article about the old urduja movie, starring amalia fuentes: http://www.coolay.com/2008/06/22/urduja
I've been always obsessed with vintage pinoy posters! I love that post
mugs1104 wrote on Jun 22, '08
ouch...and i was so looking forward to watching this movie... ~_~
shizofree wrote on Jun 22, '08, edited on Jun 22, '08
ouch...and i was so looking forward to watching this movie... ~_~
watch it na ren and see for yourself, it's just not my type of movie... too commercialized not enough depth.

skysenshi wrote on Jun 22, '08
ouch...and i was so looking forward to watching this movie... ~_~
watch it, please. the script may be badly written, but it would be nice to encourage the animators to do more projects like this.
chariloulinsey wrote on Jun 22, '08
thanks for sharing this mark! still, there is a HUGE NEED for more movies about our history - with more details of course!:D
abfrancisco wrote on Jun 23, '08
lack of research might be because of lack of necessity. bata naman manonood eh! fine, anime/animation-in-general enthusiasts (like me) will probably go and watch this, but the comic relief characters and the promotion gig based on washed-up Little Miss Phils means the target audience are kids.
that said, no matter how technically weak his film is, it would still get the thumbs-up from the kids. the parents who tagged along would be snoring halfway through, and crtical viewers like us would be left grudging in our seats, impatient to see the end credits roll and curse every single name on the silver screen for wasting our well-earned P100 something... bitter! of course there's so much room for improvement, and let's hope this sells. better plot, more budget and local support's needed. and originality. let's hope the next animation doesn't look too much like a disney rip-off.
skysenshi wrote on Jun 23, '08
lack of research might be because of lack of necessity. bata naman manonood eh!
it's the main reason why i wouldn't let my kid watch this. i'd make sure that he/she has a very deep appreciation for philippine history before i expose him/her to something educationally damaging like this.

secondly, there were pervy (bathing) scenes and stabbing scenes that make it definitely not suitable for minors.

i will wait for the kid to grow up before i let him/her see this.
shizofree wrote on Jun 23, '08, edited on Jun 23, '08
I really do not agree that the movie is suitable for kids. It borders on voyeurism, cheating, killing and more importantly, child murder. Even american TV forbids child murder. MTRCB should review the movie again. Being a cartoon doesn't mean it's automatically for kids.

That's actually what's wrong with the movie industry in the Philippines, it's always "just as long as it sells" mentality makes the movies weak and shallow. The business side of the industry deconstructs the purpose of making movies, which is to tell a story. There is no depth, no morals whatsoever, and for this particular movie, no plot.
abfrancisco wrote on Jun 23, '08
much of media is manipulated by cash. money for films doesn't come easy here, so when they invest, they want to make sure they get it back with interest. of course there a few exceptions spared from movie mediocrity that have both good plots and sales, but most movies with real international quality (like panaghoy sa suba, which flunked in the MMFF like, how many years ago?) don't sell. i don't really know why... i don't like to think filipinos like to settle for the mundane, but we can't deny that filipinos are very personality-oriented, meaning big stars, hot couple equals good movie.

as for urduja... from what the people above this post said, it ain't for kids, but the foregoing mentality in the phils. is that animation is for kids. thus, this film targeted kids. thus the disney inspired graphics and cute characters (the tarsier was a vain attempt to introduce something identifiably filipino to the film. yes, being cartoon doesn't mean it's for kids. tell that to all the filipino adults who believe otherwise. case in point: i'm scolded for being childish, because i still watch anime.
kurayami wrote on Jun 23, '08, edited on Jun 23, '08
Family Guy is a cartoon. It's being shown in TV (well, at least cable TV). But is not for kids.

As for the mentality that cartoons are just for kids, isn't it about time we re-educate ourselves and other people from that wrong notion?
abfrancisco wrote on Jun 24, '08
*sighs* i wish we did. sadly, there aren't too many cartoons on air to re-educate ourselves with the notion that cartoons are NOT always for kids! hm.. i thought about it, and since urduja did contain "suggestive" scenes, i'm beginning to wonder if its target audience were kids. but guys, if the makers weren't planning on kids seeing this, could they have been seriously thinking that an adult audience would take this movie seriously? or were the said scenes simply mistakes for a supposedly children-oriented film?

another question, for those who have seen this, were there a lot of people watching? what kind of people were they?
joedore wrote on Jun 25, '08
I haven't watched it yet. :]

Aftter reading so many reviews, I now don't know if I would still watch it.

Hmmm...Makes me think how Dayo would be like. I heard it'll be shown this December.
shizofree wrote on Jun 25, '08
joedore said
I haven't watched it yet. :]

Aftter reading so many reviews, I now don't know if I would still watch it.

Hmmm...Makes me think how Dayo would be like. I heard it'll be shown this December.
reviews are just opinions of people. Watch it and see if what the reviewers say it's true.
shizofree wrote on Jun 25, '08
*sighs* i wish we did. sadly, there aren't too many cartoons on air to re-educate ourselves with the notion that cartoons are NOT always for kids! hm.. i thought about it, and since urduja did contain "suggestive" scenes, i'm beginning to wonder if its target audience were kids. but guys, if the makers weren't planning on kids seeing this, could they have been seriously thinking that an adult audience would take this movie seriously? or were the said scenes simply mistakes for a supposedly children-oriented film?

another question, for those who have seen this, were there a lot of people watching? what kind of people were they?
Kids. a lot of kids. I think the suggetive scenes were put there without realizing and researching about the target market they were aiming at.
almiraeleazar wrote on Jul 25, '08
paki tagaog naman yun kuwento ng urduja pls .
project ko to sa filipino.
nutscracker wrote on Sep 9, '08
The first image that hit me was that of Pocahontas, but then the movie was entitled Urduja. Don't get me wrong-I was too eager to watch an all-Filipino animated movie [Urduja] but all I got was Disney cartoon trailer. It's quite depressing. I think I'll just settle for the storybook and the narrative on Urduja.
Add a Comment
How would you rate this movie? (optional)
0 out of 5 stars